full image - Repost: I can explain why AI is objectively superior to traditional workflows in exactly 5 words, but first we need to address the nuance of the current discourse. (from Reddit.com, I can explain why AI is objectively superior to traditional workflows in exactly 5 words, but first we need to address the nuance of the current discourse.)
Mining:
Exchanges:
Donations:
Look, I’ve been lurking here for a while and watching the absolute vitriol coming from the anti-side, and I think we really need to deconstruct the fundamental disconnect between the two camps. When you analyze the sociotechnical imaginary of generative adversarial networks versus the archaic, elitist gatekeeping of "traditional" skill acquisition, you start to realize that the dopamine feedback loop is inherently flawed in the manual process.We keep having these circular arguments about "soul" and "theft," but nobody is talking about the psychological toll of the blank canvas paralysis. The modern creator needs velocity. We need iteration. The barrier to entry for visualizing high-concept fantasy scapes shouldn't be 10,000 hours of repetitive motor skill conditioning that results in carpal tunnel and imposter syndrome. I have spent years trying to understand anatomy, lighting, and composition, and quite frankly, the return on investment for my mental health just isn't there.So, after analyzing the workflow efficiency and the emotional regulation provided by Stable Diffusion vs. a pencil, I have distilled the entire argument down to the only five words that actually matter in this debate:Drawing hands makes me sad.
Social Media Icons